top
Articles
  • Measuring Creativity in Singaporean Young Adults   [CPSH 2013]
  • Author(s)
  • Shuming Bai, Chee Seng Tan, Li Qu
  • ABSTRACT
  • This study seeks to develop the norm of the Wallach-Kogan Creativity Tests (WKCT) for Singaporean young adults. Two versions of the WKCT were randomly administered to 223 undergraduates (M = 20.80, SD = 1.74). The fluency and flexibility norm for the five different WKCT subtests were generated. Inter-item reliability was good for the fluency measurement but not so for the flexibility measurement. Significant format and version differences were found. Fluency for verbal tests was significantly higher than fluency for figure tests. Inherent differences between selected items of the same subtest can exist and different norms should be developed for different items in the same subtest. Establishing a norm for the creativity standards of Singaporean young adults places benchmarks to assess creativity performance, facilitating cross-cultural re-search and future research on creativity in Singapore.
  • KEYWORDS
  • Wallach-Kogan Creativity Tests; Singapore; Norm; Undergraduate
  • References
  • [1]
    Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.
    [2]
    Baer, J. & J. C. Kauf-man (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105.
    [3]
    Bloom, M, ed. 2001. Promoting creativity across the lifespan. Washington, DC: Child Welf. League Am.
    [4]
    Cheung, P. C., Lau, S., Chan, D. W., & Wu, W. Y. H. (2004). Creative potential of school chil-dren in Hong Kong: Norms of the Wallach-Kogan creativity tests and their implications. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 69-78.
    [5]
    Claridge, G. & McDonald, A. (2009). An investiga-tion into the relationships between convergent and divergent thinking, schizotypy, and autistic traits. Personality and Indi-vidual Differences, 46(8), 794-799.
    [6]
    Gough, H.G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398–1405.
    [7]
    Jaquish, G. A., & Ripple, R. E. (1984). Adolescent divergent thinking: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 95–104.
    [8]
    Kaufman, J., Plucker, J., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of crea-tivity assessment. New York: Wiley.
    [9]
    Lau, S., Cheung, P. C., Chan, D. W., Wu, W. Y. H., & Kwong, J. M. L. (1998). Creativity of school children: The use of the Wallach–Kogan Creativity Tests in Hong Kong. Technical report. Hong Kong: Center for Child Development, Hong Kong Baptist University.
    [10]
    Lau, S., & Cheung, P. C. (2010). Creativity as-sessment: Comparability of the electronic and paper-and-pencil versions of the Wallach-Kogan Creativity Tests, Think-ing Skills and Creativity, 5, 101-107.
    [11]
    Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different?: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36-45.
    [12]
    Roue, L. (2011). A study of grade level and gender differences in diver-gent thinking among 8th and 11th Graders in a mid-western school district (Doctoral dissertation). Available from Pro-Quest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3482367)
    [13]
    Rudowicz, E., Lok, D., & Kitto, J. (1995). Use of the Tor-rance Tests of Creative Thinking in an exploratory study of creativity in Hong Kong primary school children: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 417–43.
    [14]
    Runco, M. A. (1999). Divergent thinking. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. I; pp.295-311). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [15]
    Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychol-ogy, 55, 657–687.
    [16]
    Runco, M. A. & Acar, S. (2012): Diver-gent thinking as an indicator of creative potential, Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66-75.
    [17]
    Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1986). Exceptional giftedness in early adolescence and in-trafamilial divergent thinking. Journal of Youth and Adoles-cence, 15(4), 335-344.
    [18]
    Runco, M. A., Okuda, S. M., & Thurston, B. J. (1987). The psychometric properties of four systems for scoring divergent thinking tests. Journal of Psy-choeducational Assessment, 2, 149-156.
    [19]
    Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2000-2001). Development of psy-chometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Crea-tivity Research Journal, 13, 393–400.
    [20]
    Runco M. A., & Rich-ards R, eds. 1997. Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [21]
    Rushton, J. P. (1990). Creativ-ity, intelligence, and psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(12), 1291-1298.
    [22]
    Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

Engineering Information Institute is the member of/source content provider to

http://www.scirp.org http://www.hanspub.org/ http://www.crossref.org/index.html http://www.oalib.com/ http://www.ebscohost.com/ http://www.proquest.co.uk/en-UK/aboutus/default.shtml http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&Full=journal%20of%20Bioequivalence%20%26%20Bioavailability http://publishers.indexcopernicus.com/index.php