top
Articles
  • Using Dual Model in Teaching Law to Business Students: A Research Agenda   [CCE 2013]
  • Author(s)
  • J. K. L. Poon
  • ABSTRACT
  • Legal education no longer exists exclusively for law students who wish to enter the legal profession. Currently, law components are found in other programmes such as marketing, management, and accounting. However, business students at sub-degree levels often find studying law difficult and challenging. Literature suggests that a combination of traditional lecture-based learning and problem-based learning tutorials could improve student learning experiences and performance. This action research plans, implements, and evaluates the extent to which the combination of lecture-based learning and problem-based learning tutorials (i.e., dual teaching model) could be used as an effective teaching strategy in addressing the difficulty of students in learning law, thus improving relevant learning outcomes. This study involves approximately 250 students enrolled in Business Law in the academic year 2012–2013. Data will be collected through a survey and focus group interviews. Only the first basic cycle of action research will be addressed in this project because of time and resource constraints.
  • KEYWORDS
  • Problem Based Learning; Lecture Based Learning; Learning Law; Higher Education
  • References
  • [1]
    Armstrong, S., Campbell, M., & Brogan, M. (2009). Interventions to enhance the student experience of a first-year law degree: what they really wanted. Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, 2(1), 135-148.
    [2]
    Ewang, F. (2008). Teaching law to accounting and business students: A cumulative dual model. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 5(2). Available at:
    http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol5/iss2/3
    [3]
    Fitzgerald, S. (2011). The chal-lenge of teaching law subjects with large and diverse student cohorts. Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, 1(2), 113-119.
    [4]
    Kift, S. (2011). 21st century climate for change: curriculum design for quality learning engagement in law. Legal Education Review, 19(1), 1-30.
    [5]
    Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41 (4), 212-218.
    [6]
    Pepper, C. (2010). There’s a lot of learning going on but NOT much teaching!: student perceptions of Problem-Based Learning in science. Higher Education Research and Development, 29(6), 693-707.
    [7]
    Phillips, R. and Baudains, C. (2002). Effectiveness of web-based materials to support learning in botany. In: International Conference on Computers in Education, 3-6 December 2002, Auckland, New Zealand.
    [8]
    Surry, D. W., Ensminger, D.C., & Haab, M. (2005). A model for integrating instructional technol-ogy into higher education. British Journal of Education Technology, 36(2), 327-329.
    [9]
    Tanner, E. (2010). Legal language and the non-law research student. Journal of the Australasian Law Teachers Association, 3(1), 77-86.
    [10]
    Vida, A. (2007). A critical reflection on the methodology of teaching law to non-law students. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, (4), 1360-1326. Available at:
    http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2007/issue4/allen4.html

Engineering Information Institute is the member of/source content provider to

http://www.scirp.org http://www.hanspub.org/ http://www.crossref.org/index.html http://www.oalib.com/ http://www.ebscohost.com/ http://www.proquest.co.uk/en-UK/aboutus/default.shtml http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&Full=journal%20of%20Bioequivalence%20%26%20Bioavailability http://publishers.indexcopernicus.com/index.php