top
Articles
  • Investigating Argumentation by Combining Atlas-ti Qualitative Coding and WMatrix Online Corpus Analy-sis Tools   [CCE 2013]
  • Author(s)
  • Huangfu Wei
  • ABSTRACT
  • Argumentation in the sense of free-flowing discourse poses challenges for EFL students. Investigating argumentation in online discussion groups offers an opportunity for obtaining insight into how people debate with one another in such self-organized, informal circumstances. In this empirical study, the researcher attempts to use Atlas-ti qualitative coding and WMatrix online corpus analysis tools in analyzing the distribu-tion and co-occurrences of discoursal function codes and linguistic forms. Then, the detailed analyses of the gathered data shed light on patterns of co-occurrence between linguistic categories and discoursal function codes which help to illustrate online argumentation. The paper ends by highlighting the necessity of incorpo-rating this combined qualitative and quantitative methodology in discourse analysis.
  • KEYWORDS
  • Argumentation; Qualitative Coding; ANOVA Analysis; Atlas-ti; WMatrix
  • References
  • [1]
    Walton, D., Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
    [2]
    van Eemeren, F. and R. Grootendorst., A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
    [3]
    Erduran, S., S. Simon, and J. Osborne., "Tapping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse",Science Education, 2004, vol. 88, pp. 915–33.
    [4]
    E. M. Nussbaum,D. L. Winsor,Y.M. Aqui and A.M. Poliquin, "Putting the pieces together: Online argumentation VEE diagrams enhance thinking during discussions",Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2007, vol. 2, pp. 479–500.
    [5]
    Kuan-Hue Yeh and Hsiao-Ching She, "On-line synchronous scientific argumentation learning: Nurturing students' argumentation ability and conceptual change in science context",Computers & Education, 2010, vol. 55, pp. 586-602.
    [6]
    Weinberger, A. and F. Fischer., "A frame work to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning", Computers and Education, 2006, vol. 46, pp. 71–95.
    [7]
    Kenyon, L., & Reiser, B. J. "A functional approach to nature of science: Using epistemological understandings to construct and evaluate evidence", unpublished, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, 2006.
    [8]
    Schwarz, B. B., & Glassner, A., "The blind and the paralytic: Supporting argumentation in everyday and scientific issues". In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments, Norwell, MA:Kluwer, 2006, pp.227–260.
    [9]
    Rayson, P., "Wmatrix:a web-based corpus processing environment", unpublished, Computing Department, Lancaster University, 2008, Available at:
    http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/wmatrix.
    [10]
    Baker, P., "Querying key words: questions of difference, frequency, and sense in key words analysis",Journal of English Linguistics, 2004, vol.32, pp. 346–59.

Engineering Information Institute is the member of/source content provider to

http://www.scirp.org http://www.hanspub.org/ http://www.crossref.org/index.html http://www.oalib.com/ http://www.ebscohost.com/ http://www.proquest.co.uk/en-UK/aboutus/default.shtml http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&Full=journal%20of%20Bioequivalence%20%26%20Bioavailability http://publishers.indexcopernicus.com/index.php