• Design and construct IT Performance architecture: settle the IT productivity paradox from critical realism   [MASS 2012]
  • Author(s)
  • Cui. Lei, Wang. Huifen
  • This article conceptualizes Information Technology (IT) performance architecture with dynamic performance process and performance structure, and tries to settle the IT productivity paradox from critical realism. Two assessment principles are presented: that IT performance assessment procedures should include in the dynamic implementation process in which IT performance are produced by unique individual enterprises, and that assessments should tap IT systems that are possessed by the individual enterprises being assessed and that causally contribute to their overt implementation experiences and actions. The limitations of traditional IT performance assessment strategies based on between-enterprises performance metrics are discussed in light of these principles. The article then outlines an alternative strategy in which performance architecture are designed and constructed in dynamic procedure that is sensitive to the potentially idiosyncratic performance of individual enterprise. The authors argue that IT system performance assessment can be considered under the IT performance architecture.
  • IT Performance architecture, IT productivity paradox, Critical realism
  • References
  • [1]
    Brynjolfsson, E. "The productivity paradox of information technology: review and assessment". Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 1993, pp. 67-77.
    Shang, S. & Seddon, P.B. (2000) A comprehensive frame-work for classifying the benefits of ERP systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chung, H. (ed.), pp. 1005–1014. Association for Information Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
    Kraemer, K., Dedrick, J., and Yamashiro, S. "Refining and Extending the Business Model with Information Technology: Dell Computer Corporation," The Information Society (16:1) 2000, pp 5-21.
    Loukis, E., Sapounas, I., Aivalis, K. "The Effect of Generalized Competition and Strategy on the Business Value of Information and Communication Technologies" Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 21, No 1, 2008, pp. 13-23.
    Cervone, D. "Personality architecture: Within-person structures and processes," Annu. Rev. Psychol. (56) 2005, pp 423-452.
    Lin, F., and Cheng, T. C. E. "The structural theory of general systems applied in management: the total relationship flow management theorems," International Journal of General Systems (36:6) 2007, pp 673-681.
    Kagan J. 2003. Biology, context, and develop-mental inquiry. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54:1–23.
    Bandura A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., and Xue, Y. "Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management," MIS Quarterly (31:1) 2007, pp 59-87.
    Bhaskar, R. (1989), Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy,Verso, London.
    Lazarus RS. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
    Archer, M. 1996. "Social Integration and Syst em Integration: Developing the Distinction," Sociology (30:4), pp. 679-699.
    Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., and Norrie, A. (eds.). 1998. Critical Realism: Essential Readings, London: Routledge.

Engineering Information Institute is the member of/source content provider to