top
A-Z20182019Previous ConferencesConference Articles
二维码
 
Articles
  • OpenAccess
  • Procurement Method Selection for Building Maintenance Projects: The Case of Malaysian Public Universities  [CCES 2014]
  • DOI: 10.4236/wjet.2014.23B002   PP.7 - 13
  • Author(s)
  • Shirley Jin Lin Chua, Azlan Shah Ali, Anuar Alias
  • ABSTRACT

  • The purpose of this paper is to implement and validate a decision making framework for building maintenance projects. The growing importance of maintenance sector not only in Malaysia but al- so increasingly globalized, the difficulty in selecting an appropriate procurement method and lack of research in this area provide an impetus for this research. There were 19 procurement selection criteria identified. In addition, there were 4 types of procurements methods which include outsourcing by specialist term contract, outsourcing by tendered schedule term contract, out- sourcing by repair and maintenance contract and outsourcing by measured term contract identified to be the most popular procurement methods adapted by public universities currently and at the same time were considered most important. The decision making framework was developed based on AHP technique and principles. Expert Choice Software was employed as development tool where the criteria and alternatives were integrated into the framework. Finally, structured interview was conducted to validate the framework developed. The validation process was carried out through structured interview with selected public university.

  • KEYWORDS
  • Analytic Hierarchy Process, Expert Choice Software, Procurement Method, Building Maintenance Management, Public Universities
  • References
  • [1]
    Ng, S.T., Luu, D.T. and Chen, S.E. (2002) Decision Criteria and Their Subjectivity in Construction Procurement Selection. The Australian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 2, 70-80.
    [2]
    Hui, E.Y.Y. and Tsang, A.H.C. (2004) Sourcing Strategies of Facilities Management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 10, 85-92.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552510410539169
    [3]
    Hashim, M., Li, M.C.Y., Yin, N.C., et al. (2006) Factors Influencing the Selection of Procurement Systems by Clients. International Conference on Construction Industry, 2006, Padang, 1-10.
    [4]
    Alhazmi, T. and McCaffer, R. (2000) Project Procurement System Selection Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126, 176-184.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:3(176)
    [5]
    Masterman, J.W.E. (1996) Building Procurement Systems: An Introduction. Spon Press, London.
    [6]
    Ibbs, W. and Chih, Y.-Y. (2011) Alternative Methods for Choosing an Appropriate Project Delivery System (PDS). Facilities, 29, 527-541.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02632771111178418
    [7]
    Ratnasabapathy, S. and Rameezdeen, R. (2007) A Decision Support System for the Selection of Best Procurement System in Construction. Built-Environment Sri Lanka, 7, 53-43.
    [8]
    Masterman, J.W.E. (1992) An Introduction to Building Procurement Systems. Spon Press, London.
    [9]
    Cheung, S.O., Lam, T.I., Leung, M.Y., et al. (2001) An Analytical Hierarchy Process Based Procurement Selection Method. Construction Management and Economics, 19, 427-437.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014461901300132401

Engineering Information Institute is the member of/source content provider to

http://www.scirp.org http://www.hanspub.org/ http://www.crossref.org/index.html http://www.oalib.com/ http://www.ebscohost.com/ http://www.proquest.co.uk/en-UK/aboutus/default.shtml http://ip-science.thomsonreuters.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jlresults.cgi?PC=MASTER&Full=journal%20of%20Bioequivalence%20%26%20Bioavailability http://publishers.indexcopernicus.com/index.php