[1]
Yanchuk, V.A. (2000) Methodology, Theory, and Methods in Modern Social Psychology and Personology: An Integrative-Eclectical Approach. Bestprint, Minsk. (Russian)
[2]
Yanchuk, V.A. (2006) Postmodernist, Sociocultural-Interdeterminist Dialogisity as a Prospect of Positioning in Psychology Subject Methodology and History of Psychology, 1, 193-206. (Russian)
[3]
Yanchuk, V.A. (2007) Postmodernist, Sociocultural-Interdeterminist Dialogical Prospect of Explanation in Psychology Methodology and History of Psychology, 2, 207-226. (Russian)
[4]
Yanchuk, V.A. (2009) Progress in Psychological Phenomenology Understanding: Sociocultural-Interdeterminist Dialogical Prospect. In: Zguravlev, A.L., Marzinkovskaya, T.L. and Yurevich, A.V., Eds., Progress in Psychology: Criteria and Indicators, Institute of Psychology RAS, Moscow, 262-285. (Russian)
[5]
Yanchar, S.C. and Slife, B.D. (2000) Putting It All Together: Toward a Hermeneutic Unity of Psychology. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 21, 325-326.
[6]
Goertzen, J.R. (2010) Dialectical Pluralism: A Theoretical Conceptualization of Pluralism in Psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 201-209.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.09.013
[7]
Yanchuk, V.A. (2005) Introduction to Modern Social Psychology. ASAR, Minsk, 768 p. (Russian)
[8]
Healy, P. (2012) Toward an Integrative, Pluralistic Psychology: On the Hermeneutico-Dialogical Conditions of the Possibility for Overcoming Fragmentation. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 271-280.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.005
[9]
Smythe, W.E. and McKenzie, S.A. (2010) A Vision of Dialogical Pluralism in Psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 227-234.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.09.016
[10]
Teo, T. (2010) Ontology and Scientific Explanation: Pluralism as an a Priori Condition of Psychology New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 235-243.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.09.017
[11]
Valsiner Y. (2007) Becoming Integrative in Science: Re-building Contemporary Psychology through Interdisciplinary and International Collaboration. Integrative Psycho-logical and Behavioral Science, 41, 1-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9002-2
[12]
Ishii, S. (1997) Tasks for Intercultural Communication Researchers in the Asia-Pacific Region in the 21st Century. Dokkyo International Review, 10, 313-326.
[13]
Samovar, L.A., Porter, R.E. and McDaniel, E.R. (2010) Communication between Cultures. 7th Edition, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.
[14]
Samovar, L.A., Porter, R.E. and McDaniel, E.R. (2010) Communication between Cultures. 7th Edition, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Boston, MA, 150.
[15]
Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E. and McDaniel, E. R. (2012) In-tercultural Communication: A Reader. 13th Edition, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Boston, MA, 67.
[16]
Jahoda, G. (2013) Critical Reflections on Some Recent Definitions of “Culture”. Culture & Psychology, 18, 289-303.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354067X12446229
[17]
Kroeber, A.L. and Kluckhohn, C. (1952) Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Peabody Museum, Cambridge, MA.
[18]
Kroeber, A.L. and Kluckhohn, C. (1952) Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Peabody Museum, Cambridge, MA, 181.
[19]
Hong, Y. (2009) A Dynamic Constructivist Approach to Culture: Moving from Describing Culture to Explaining Culture. In: Wyer, R.S., Chiu, C.-Y. and Hong, Y.-Y., Eds., Understanding Culture: Theory, Research and Application (pp. 3-23). Psychology Press, New York.
[20]
Wan, C. and Chiu, C. (2009). An Intersubjective Consensus Approach to Culture. The Role of Intersubjective Norms versus Cultural Self in Cultural Processes. In Wyer, R.S., Chiu, C.-Y. and Hong, Y.-Y., Eds., Understanding Culture: Theory, Research and Application, Psychology Press, New York, 80, 79-91.
[21]
Ishii, S. (1997) Tasks for Intercultural Communication Researchers in the Asia-Pacific Region in the 21st Century. Dokkyo International Review, 10, 313-326.
[22]
Ishii, S. (1997) Tasks for Intercultural Communication Researchers in the Asia-Pacific Region in the 21st Century. Dokkyo International Review, 10, 313-326, 321.
[23]
Yanchuk V.A. (2000) Methodology, Theory, and Methods in Modern Social Psychology and Personology: An Integrative-Eclectical Approach. Bestprint, Minsk, 11.
[24]
Yanchuk, V.A. (2006) Postmodernist, Sociocultural-Interdeterminist Dialogisity as a Prospect of Positioning in Psychology Subject. Methodology and History of Psychology, 1, 204. (Russian)
[25]
Ranganath, K.A., Spellman, B.A. and Joy-Gaba, J.A. (2010) Cognitive “Category-Based Induction” Research and Social “Persuasion” Research Are Each about What Makes Arguments Believable: A Tale of Two Literatures. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 115-122.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691610361604
[26]
Meiser, T. (2011) Much Pain, Little Gain? Paradigm-Specific Models and Methods in Experimental Psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 183-184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691611400241
[27]
Healy, P. (2012) Toward an integrative, Pluralistic Psychology: On the Hermeneutico-Dialogical Conditions of the Possibility for Overcoming Fragmentation New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 275-278.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.005
[28]
Sternberg, R.J. and Grigorenko, E.L. (2001) Unified Psychology. American Psychologist, 56, 1069-1079.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.12.1069
[29]
Nilsson A. (2014) Personality Psychology as the Integrative Study of Traits and Worldviews. New ideas in Psychology, 32, 29.
[30]
Bandura, A. (1986) Social Foundation of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[31]
Franklin, C.W. (1982) Theoretical Perspectives in Social Psychology. Little, Brown and Company, Boston.
[32]
Yanchuk, V.A. (2010) Cul-tural Framing as Determinant of Mutual Understanding in the Conditions of Cultural Diversity. Psychological Journal, 2, 41-48. (Russian)
[33]
Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Pantheon Books, New York.
[34]
Bukobza, G. (2007) The Epistemological Basis of Selfhood. New Ideas in Psychology, 25, 37-65.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.11.001
[35]
Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Pantheon Books, New York, xiv.
[36]
Pepper, S.C. (1942) World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. University of California Press, Berkeley.
[37]
Yanchuk, V.A. (2014) The Methodological, Theoretical and Empirical Problems of the Unclosely and Closely-Related Cultures and Ethnosis Research. In: Gritsenko, V., Ed., Theoretical Problems of Ethnic and Cross-Cultural Psychology: Materials of 4-th International Conference, May 30-31, 2014, Smolensk: Smolensk Humanitarian University, Vol. 1, 15-23. (Russian)
[38]
Bustamante, R.M., Nelson, J.A. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2009) Assessing Schoolwide. Cultural Competence: Implications for School Leadership Preparation Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 793-827.
[39]
Sue, D.W. (2001) Multidimensional Facets of Cultural Competence The Counseling Psychologist, 29, 790-821.
[40]
Yanchuk, V.A. (2013) Eco-Cultural Educational Environment: Formation and Development. Part 2: From Cultural to the Intercultural Competence. Education and Nurture, 1, 69-76. (Russian)
[41]
Bustamante, R.M., Nelson, J.A. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2009) Assessing Schoolwide. Cultural Competence: Implications for School Leadership Preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 793-827.
[42]
Smith, P.B., Peterson, M.F., Thomason, S.J., Yanchuk, V.A., et al. (2011) National Culture as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Managers’ Use of Guidance Sources and How Well Work Events Are Handled. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 42, 1101-1121.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022110381427
[43]
Smith, P.B., Torres, C.V., Yanchuk, V.A., et al. (2011) Individualism-Collectivism and Business Context as Predictors of Behaviors in Cross-National Work Settings: Incidence and Outcomes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 440-451.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.02.001
[44]
Matsumoto, D. (2009) The Cambridge Dictionary of Psychology. David Matsumoto (General ed.), Cambridge University Press, 61.
[45]
Spencer-Oatey, H. and Franklin, P. (2009) Intercultural Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Intercultural Communication. Palgrave Macmillan.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230244511
[46]
Chen, G.-M. and Starosta, W.J. (1996) Intercultural Communication Competence: A Synthesis. Communication Yearbook, 19, 353-384.
[47]
Ting-Toomey, S. (1999) Communicating across Cultures. The Guilford Press, New York, 261.
[48]
Hermans, H.J.M. and Kempen, H.J. (1993) The Dialogical Self. Academic Press, London.
[49]
Hermans, H.J.M. (2002) The Dialogical Self as a Society of Mind: Introduction. Theory & Psychology, 12, 147-160.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959354302122001
[50]
Bakhtin, M.M. (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 183.
[51]
Tu, W. (2001) The Context of Dialogue: Globalization and Diversity. In: Picco, G., Ed., Crossing the Divide: Dialogue among Civilizations, School of Diplomacy and International Relations, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ, 49- 96.