• OpenAccess
  • Knowledge Management and Action Learning in Blended Training Activities  [CEAE 2013]
  • DOI: 10.4236/ce.2013.49B010   PP.51 - 55
  • Author(s)
  • Pattama Chandavimol, Onjaree Natakuatoong, Pornsook Tantrarungroj
  • The purpose of this study is to propose blended training activities by applying the knowledge management techniques and action learning into the training process. The proposed data are from study of the theory, documents, surveys, problems, and needs in knowledge Management and Action Learning to develop blended training techniques. The questionnaires were answered by 261 respondents who are personnel development staffs experienced in designing training courses, organizing these courses, and writing up training projects for government units in Thailand. The process development was brought to discussion with 5 field experts in distance learning, training, instructional design and curriculum development, Educational Technology and Communication, and organization development areas. The data were analyzedbyusing basic statistical techniques such as frequency distribution, percentage, descriptive and open-ended surveys, brought to analyze and categorize the information, then propose the findings. The key findings show that organizing the blended training process consists of 3 steps: pre-training, training, end-of-training. In each step, the blended activities, traditional classroom training, online and E-Learning are used with knowledge management activities and action learning. Then using technology to enhance learning processes such as blogging, chat, discussion boards, e-mail, E-learning courseware, and learning management systems.

  • Action Learning; Blended Training; Knowledge Management
  • References
  • [1]
    Echols, M. E. (2010). An informal debate: Bridging the gap between formal and informal learning. Chief Learning Officer. =1095537&hhSearchTerms=August+and+2010
    Bonk, C. J., Graham, C. R., Cross, J., & Moore, M. G. (2006). The handbook of blended learn-ing: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeif-fer.
    Boonyatarokul, W. (2002). Lecture’s manual and training manager. Bangkok: Dansutha Printing.
    Candlin, D., & Wright, S. (1992). Managing the introduction of expert systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 12, 46-59.
    Kusumawalee, S. (1997). Developing the learning or-ganization guidelines in developing organization resources to develop Thailand in next century. Documents used at academic seminar in the occasion of the 80th Anniversary of the Establishment of National Institute of Development Administration.
    Marquardt, M. J. (1999). Action learning in action: Transforming problems and people for world-class organizational learning. Palo Alto, Calif: Davies-Black.
    Miner, N., & Hofmann, J. (2009). More than a merge: Successful blended learning demands thinking ahead and building a thorough understanding of modalities. T & D. January, 30.
    NaTakuatoong, O. (1997). 2708652 Course Materials for Educational Technology in Training. Bangkok: Faculty of Education, Chulalong-korn University.
    Richey, R. C., Fields, D. C., & Foxon, M. (2001). Instructional design competencies: The standards (3rd ed.). Syracuse, NY: Eric Clearing- house on Information Technology.
    Sukmuang, U., & Ekun, N. (2009). Training approach according to ISO 10015 standard. Journal of Science Department Service,57,14-17.
    Swart, J. (2005). Human resource development: Strategy and tactics. Oxford: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.
    Thieanphut, D. (2000). The HRD planning for next millennium for professional trainer. Bangkok: DNT Consultants.

Engineering Information Institute is the member of/source content provider to