Investing in Strategies to Accelerate Conservation and Measure Impact in the Delaware River Watershed

Home | Sitemap | Contact Us

A-Z 2018 2019 Previous Conferences Conference Articles

Articles

Investing in Strategies to Accelerate Conservation and Measure Impact in the Delaware River Watershed [CSWCER 2016]
DOI: 10.4236/gep.2016.47023 PP.201 - 208
Author(s)
William Penn Foundation
ABSTRACT
The Delaware River watershed provides drinking water to over 15 million people, critical habitat for plants and animals, including many threatened and endangered species, and recreational and economic enterprise valued at $10 billion per year in direct wages. Water quality and associated economic, environmental and social values have improved dramatically since the 1950s when the lower portion of the river was declared a dead zone during parts of the summer due to excessive inputs of domestic and industrial waste. The question today is how to ensure that progress continues in the face of persistent and growing threats to water quality. Recognizing the challenges facing the watershed, over 40 of the leading conservation groups in this 13,000 square mile region are pursuing a 10-year strategic initiative focused on water quality through the Delaware River Watershed Initiative, a conservation program advancing a combination of place-based work in watershed protection, restoration, education, collaboration and innovation through collective impact. This paper serves as an invitation for broader strategic involvement to accelerate watershed protection and restoration; it also is a springboard for stakeholders to set an agenda for ensuring that the Delaware River watershed delivers clean water for humans, plants and animals. The paper identifies eight “clusters” of sub-watersheds, constituting approximately 25 percent of the total Delaware Basin, where analysis has shown that investment in water quality could deliver significant returns. Diverse geology, land use, development patterns, population density and en-vironmental stressors are present throughout these sub-watershed clusters. Focusing conservation actions in these places contributes directly to local water quality, and by fostering experimentation and innovation, it also cultivates a wide range of effective approaches for scaling up investment across the Delaware River watershed and beyond. This paper emphasizes five strategies for investing in protection of high quality waters and restoration of impaired waters: 1. protect forested headwaters to maintain high water quality; 2. manage agricultural lands to reduce polluted runoff and increase groundwater infiltration; 3. implement best practices and new financial incentives to reduce urban stormwater pollution through natural processes; 4. increase the evidence base for watershed protection by monitoring trends in water quality and assessing project impacts; 5. improve policy and practice through applied research focused on water quality outcomes. These strategies demand place-based work, and the Delawre River Watershed Initiative will focus on advancing these efforts through the cooperation of organizations located in the eight distinct watershed clusters. Proceeding downstream from the headwaters, the eight landscapes are: Pocono Mountains and Kittatinny Ridge; New Jersey Highlands; Upper Lehigh River; Middle Schuylkill River; Schuylkill Highlands; Brandywine and Christina Rivers Upstream; Suburban Philadelphia; and Kirkwood-Cohansey Aquifer (comprising New Jersey’s Bayshore; and Pine Barrens). These clusters bring together many of the most ecologically valuable and significantly impaired areas of the watershed. They are strategically located where strong organizations and critical natural vatues provide measurable opportunities for advancing local water quality while having regional impact. The selection of areas and strategies was based on research and planning undertaken by the Open Space Institute (OSI) and the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University (ANSDU} with support from the William Penn Foundation. Researchers at OSI and ANSDU were joined by the National Fish and Wildlfe Foundation (NFWF) in engaging over 40 organizations working across the eight sub-watershed clusters to develop collaborative plans for implementing and measuring local conservation strategies essential to the long-term health and vibrancy of the region. These implementation plans tackle major threats to water quality and include strategies to track progress and share lessons learned. The plans provide a framework for public agencies and philanthropic funders seeking to pursue targeted watershed protection outcomes supported by monitoring, technical assistance and ongoing communications. Organizations large and small, public and private, are invited to read this paper and consider this program as an opportunity to align investment for greater impact and help ensure a bright future for the Delaware River watershed.
KEYWORDS
Environment, Watershed, Ecology, Stewardship, Land Management, Water Quality, Adaptive Management, Delaware River, Mid-Atlantic, Innovation, Collaboration, Community
References
[1]
Dale, F. (1996) Delaware Diary: Episodes in the Life of a River. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, 203.
[2]
Kauffman, G., Belden, A., Hornsey, A., Porter, M., Zarnadze, A., Ehrenfeld, J., Stanwood, S., Sherwin, L., Farrell, J., DeWalle, D. and Cole, C. (2008) Technical Summary: State of the Delaware Basin Report. University of Delaware, Cornell University, Rutgers University, and Pennsylvania State University for the Delaware River Basin Commission and Partnership for the Delaware Estuary, 135.
[3]
Kauffman, G.J. (2011) Socioeconomic Value of the Delaware River Basin in Delaware, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. University of Delaware Water Resources Agency, Newark, 99.
[4]
Towne, C. (2012) A River Again, the Story of the Schuylkill River Project. Delaware Riverkeeper Network Press, Bristol.
[5]
Sharp, J.H. (2010) Estuarine Oxygen Dynamics: What Can We Learn About Hypoxia from Long-Time Records in the Delaware Estuary? Limnology and Oceanography, 55, 535-548.
[6]
Delaware River Basin Commission (2008) Delaware River State of the Basin Report. West Trenton.
[7]
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Delaware River Basin Commission (2012) Integrated Water Resources Science and Services, Delaware River Basin Commission Stakeholder Report.
[8]
Delaware River Basin Commission (2014) Approved Docket Map.
[9]
Environmental Protection Agency (2005) National Management Measures to Control Nonpoint Source Pollution from Urban Areas. EPA 841-B-05-004. Washington DC; and Whitall, D., Bricker, S., Ferreira, J., Nobre, A.M., Simas, T., and Silva, M. (2007) Assessment of Eutrophication in Estuaries: Pressure-State-Response and Nitrogen Source Apportionment. Environment Management, 40, 678-690.
[10]
River Basin Commission (2014) Approved Docket Map.
[11]
Pocono Mountains Visitors Bureau (2013) 2013 Annual Report. Stroudsburg, PA.; and Wayne County Planning Commission and Planning Department (2010) Wayne County, Pennsylvania Comprehensive Plan Update.
[12]
Kauffman, G.J. (2011) Socioeconomic Value of the Delaware River Basin in Delaware, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. University of Delaware Water Resources Agency, Newark, 99.
[13]
Environmental Protection Agency (2013) EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System.
[14]
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (1988) New Jersey Coastal Plain Aquifer. Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Gloucester, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, and Salem Counties. Trenton.
[15]
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2014) World Network of Biosphere Reserves. Paris.
[16]
Albert, R.C. (1988) The Historical Context of Water Quality Management for the Delaware Estuary. Estuaries, 11, 99-107.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1351997 Bateman, B. and Rancier, R. (2012) Case Studies in Integrated Water Management: From Local Stewardship to National Vision. American Water Resources Association Policy Committee, Middleburg, VA, 60.
[17]
Mandarano, L.A., Featherstone, J.P. and Paulsen, K. (2008) Institutions for Interstate Water Resources Management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 44, 136-147.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00143.x
[18]
Delaware River Basin Commission (2008) Delaware River State of the Basin Report. West Trenton.
[19]
Philadelphia Water Department (2011) Green City, Clean Waters The City of Philadelphia’s Program for Combined Sewer Overflow Control, Program Summary (Amended).
[20]
Delaware River Basin Commission (2008) Nutrient Criteria Strategy for the Tidal and Non-Tidal Delaware River; and Environmental Protection Agency (2003) Urban Nonpoint Source Fact Sheet.
[21]
Brown, T.C. and Froemke, P. (2012) Nationwide Assessment of Nonpoint Source Threats to Water Quality. BioScience, 62, 136-114.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.2.7
[22]
Moore, R.B., Johnston, C.M., Smith, R.A. and Milstead, B. (2011) Source and Delivery of Nutrients to Receiving Waters in the Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic Regions of the United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 47, 965-990.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00582.x
[23]
Bricker, S., Longstaff, B.,Dennison, W., Jones, A., Belcourt, K., Wicks, C. and Woerner, J. (2007) Effects of Nutrient Enrichment in the Nation’s Estuaries: A Decade of Change. Mid-Atlantic Estuary Summary. Silver Spring, MD: NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No. 26. National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science; and Sharp, J.H., Yoshiyama, K., Parker, A.E., Schwartz, M.C., Curless, M.C., Beauregard, A.Y., Ossolinksi, J.E. and Davis, A.R. (2009) A Biogeochemical View of Estuarine Eutrophication: Seasonal and Spatial Trends and Correlations in the Delaward Estuary. Estuaries and Coasts, 32, 10223-1043.
[24]
Pinelands Preservation Alliance, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, and US Geological Survey. (2012) Pinelands Science-Policy Forum on Kirkwood Cohansey Aquifer, Report 2.
[25]
Sweeney, B. (2004) Riparian Deforestation, Stream Narrowing, and Loss of Stream Ecosystem Services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 14132-14137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405895101
[26]
Newbold, J.D., Herbert, S., Sweeney, B.W., Kiry, P. and Alberts, S.J. (2010) Water Quality Functions of a 15-Year- Old Riparian Forest Buffer System. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 46, 299-310.
[27]
Kreeger, D., Adkins, J., Cole, P., Najjar, R., Velinsky, D., Conolly, P. and Kraeuter, J. (2010) Climate Change and the Delaware Estuary: Three Case Studies Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Planning. Partnership for the Delaware Estuary, PDE Report No. 10-01. 1-117.
[28]
Marshall, E. and Randhir, T. (2008) Effect of Climate Change on Watershed System: A Regional Effect. Climatic Change, 89, 263-280.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9389-2
[29]
Messersmith, D. (2014) 2014 Pipeline Roundup: Moving Marcellus and Utica Production to New Markets. Penn State Cooperative Extension.
[30]
Johnson, N., Gagnolet, T., Ralls, R., Zimmerman, E., Eichelberger, B., Tracey, C., Kretler, G., Orndorff, S., Tomlinson, J., Bearer, S. and Sargent, S. (2010) Pennsylvania Energy Impacts Assessment Part 1 and 2,47; Vidic, R.D., Brantley, S.L., Vandenbossche, J.M., Yoxtheimer, D. and Abad, J.D. (2013) Impact of Shale Gas Development on Re-gional Water Quality. Science, 340.

Select by Subject

Select by City

Contact Us