There
are some disadvantages in the simple, unscientific and unreasonable teaching
evaluation. Resulting in the evaluation of the teaching data is not reliable,
objective, cannot be true, fair and impartial reflection of the teacher’s
teaching level. If the results of this assessment are linked to the teacher’s
all kinds of interests, It is easy to cause serious negative effects to the
teacher’s enthusiasm and to disturb the teaching atmosphere and influence the
teaching quality. How to make the evaluation of science, objective, fair and
impartial reflection of the teacher’s teaching level, to make it more effective
to improve the quality of teaching is very important. Some suggestions are put
forward in this paper.
[1]
Ma, X.L., Zhong, K.D. and Liu, L.C. (2014) Research of the Validity about SETQ by Big Data Analysis. China Educa-tional Technology, 333, 78-84.
[2]
Gu, Y.Y. (2008) Review of Practice and Theoretical Research of College Student Evaluation of Teaching in America. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, 24, 13-18.
[3]
Bie, D.R. and Meng, F. (2007) On Student Evaluation of Teaching and Improvement of the Teaching Quality Assurance System in HEIs. Journal of Higher Education, 28, 77-83.
[4]
Wachtel, H.K. (1998) Student Evaluation of College Teaching Effectiveness: A Brief Review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 191-212.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230207
[5]
Mao, L.L. (2007) Studies on Peer-Review’s Major Principal of Fair-and-Square. Master D. Thesis, Donghua University, China.
[6]
Deng, J.X. (2002) The Research on the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education. Master D. Thesis, Hunan University, China.
[7]
Meng, F. (2010) On Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness in Universities—A Stakeholder Perspective. Ph.D. Thesis, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, China.