• OpenAccess
  • Strategic Economic Partnerships, Exchange Rate Policy and Agricultural Trade: A Gravity Model Analysis of China’s Agricultural Trade Flows  [AEC 2016]
  • DOI: 10.4236/jss.2016.45008   PP.48 - 55
  • Author(s)
  • Tadiwanashe Muganyi, Haibo Chen
  • Agricultural trade in China is greatly influenced by government policy activities particularly regional integration agreements, strategic economic partnerships and exchange rate policy. China’s agricultural sector has grown significantly in the past two decades however the factors that have led to this growth have not been fully explored. This study applied the Gravity model in analyzing China’s bilateral agricultural trade flows with its major agricultural trading partners namely USA, Brazil, Japan, Thailand, Australia, Indonesia, Canada, Malaysia, Russia and Hong Kong. The study utilized trade flow panel data spanning over 15 years, from the year 2000 to 2014. Estimation results revealed that economic size, market size, distance between capitals, annual average market exchange rate, regional integration/strategic economic partnership status, cultural beliefs and language were all significant factors in explaining China’s bilateral agricultural trade flows for selected commodities in the period under review.

  • Gravity Model, Agricultural Trade, China
  • References
  • [1]
    Bonarriva, J. (2011) China’s Agricultural Trade: Competitive Conditions and Effects on US Exports. US International Trade Commission, Washington DC.
    Qiu, H., et al. (2007) Impact of China-ASEAN Free Trade Area on China’s International Agricultural Trade and Its Regional Development. China & World Economy.
    Leontief, W. (1953) Domestic Production and Foreign Trade; the American Capital Position Re-Examined. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 97.
    Feenstra, R. and Hanson, G. (2001) Global Production Sharing and Rising Inequality: A Survey of Trade and Wages. National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Evenett, S.J. and Keller, W. (1998) On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation. National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Eaton, J. and Kortum, S. (2002) Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica, 70.
    Deardoff, A. (1998) Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Model Work in a Classical World. The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago University Press.
    Anderson, J.E. and van Wincoop, E. (2003) Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. American Economic Review, 93, 170-192.
    Hummels, D. and Klenow, P.J. (2005) The Variety and Quality of a Nation’s Exports. American Economic Review, 704-723.
    Abeysinghe, T. and Ding, L. (2003) China as an Eco-nomic Powerhouse: Implications on Its Neighbors. China Economic Review, 14.
    Binh, D.T.T., Duong, N.V. and Cuong, H.M. (2011) Applying Gravity Model to Analyze Trade Activities of Vietnam.
    Krugman, P.R. (2008) International economics: Theory and policy, 8/E. Pearson Education India.
    Baltagi, B. (2008) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. John Wiley & Sons.
    Torres-Reyna, O. (2007) Panel Data Analysis Fixed and Random Effects Using Stata (v. 4.2). Data & Statistical Services, Priceton University.
    Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W. (2007) Introduction to Econometrics. P. Addi-son-Wesley,
    Greene, W.H. (2008) The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth, 92-250.
    Baldwin, R. and Taglioni, D. (2006) Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations. National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Hoechle, D., Schaub, N. and Schmid, M. (2012) The Pre-Announcement Effect of Analyst Recommendations: The Impact of Time Stamp Errors. Working Paper, Swiss Institute of Banking and Finance.

Engineering Information Institute is the member of/source content provider to